Capture vs ApiFlash

Full-featured platform vs budget-friendly simplicity. We'll help you understand which approach fits your screenshot API needs and budget constraints.

Quick Overview

Full Platform vs Simple Screenshot Service

C
Capture

Founded: 2017
Approach: Comprehensive multi-API platform
Focus: Screenshots, PDFs, content scraping, AI browser
Developer Experience: Official SDKs, extensive documentation

A
ApiFlash

Founded: Established service
Approach: Simple, cost-effective screenshot API
Focus: Screenshots only, essential features
Developer Experience: Manual API integration, basic documentation

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

A detailed breakdown showing how these two very different approaches to screenshot APIs compare.

FeatureCaptureApiFlash
Established Since
2017
Several years (established)
Daily Volume
17M+ requests processed
Millions of screenshots daily (200+ businesses)
Free Tier
100 credits forever
100 screenshots/month forever
Entry-level Pricing
$15 for 2,500 credits
$7/month for 1,000 screenshots
Pricing Model
Pay-per-use (No subscription)
Monthly subscription
API Endpoints
Screenshots, PDF, Content, Metadata, AI Browser
Screenshots only
SDK Availability
Node.js, Go, Rust official SDKs
No official SDKs (manual API requests)
Output Formats
PNG, JPEG, WebP, PDF
PNG, JPEG, WebP
Infrastructure
Global CDN with caching
AWS Lambda-based
Rate Limiting
60-240 requests/minute (plan dependent)
20 requests/second, 400 burst
HTTPS Support
All plans include HTTPS
All plans include HTTPS
S3 Integration
Built-in S3 upload support
S3 bucket integration available
Advanced Features
Cookie banner handling, Slack integration, Auto-recharge
Basic screenshot features only

Developer Experience: SDK vs Manual API

See the difference between using official SDKs versus manual API integration.

Capture with SDK

✅ Type safety
✅ Auto-completion
✅ Multiple APIs
✅ Error handling built-in

ApiFlash Manual API

⚠️ Manual URL construction
⚠️ No type safety
⚠️ Screenshots only
⚠️ Manual error handling

Pricing: Value vs Pure Cost

Understanding the trade-offs between feature-rich platforms and budget-focused services.

CCapture Pricing

$15
2,500 credits
$0.006 per screenshot • Multi-API access
$75
25,000 credits
$0.003 per screenshot • Most Popular
$250
100,000 credits
$0.0025 per screenshot • Priority support
Model:Pay-per-use
APIs included:5 different APIs
SDKs:Official support

AApiFlash Pricing

$7/mo
1,000 screenshots
$0.007 per screenshot • Basic support
$35/mo
10,000 screenshots
$0.0035 per screenshot • Priority support
Custom
Enterprise
Volume pricing available
Model:Monthly subscription
APIs included:Screenshots only
SDKs:None

Value Analysis

For basic screenshots only: ApiFlash is cheaper at low volumes

For multiple APIs: Capture provides PDFs, content scraping, metadata, and AI browser for the same price

Developer productivity: Capture's SDKs save significant development time vs manual integration

Flexibility: Capture's pay-per-use model better for variable usage patterns

Which Service Should You Choose?

The choice depends on your priorities: feature richness vs simplicity, developer experience vs cost.

Choose Capture if:

  • You need multiple APIs beyond just screenshots (PDF, content, metadata, AI browser)
  • You want official SDKs for easier integration and better developer experience
  • You prefer pay-per-use pricing without monthly subscription commitments
  • You need higher rate limits for demanding applications
  • You want advanced features like Slack integration and auto-recharge
  • You're building complex applications that require web content extraction
  • You value established service history and proven reliability (since 2017)

Choose ApiFlash if:

  • You only need basic screenshot functionality
  • Budget is your primary concern and you need the cheapest option
  • You're comfortable with manual API integration without SDKs
  • You have low-volume screenshot needs (under 1,000/month)
  • You prefer simple, no-frills services without extra features
  • You're building proof-of-concepts or simple applications
  • AWS Lambda infrastructure fits your existing stack

Migrating from ApiFlash to Capture

If you're ready to upgrade from basic screenshots to a full-featured platform, here's how easy it is to switch.

Before: ApiFlash Manual Integration

After: Capture with SDK

Migration Benefits

Cleaner, more maintainable code
Access to 5 different APIs
No monthly subscription commitment
Better rate limits and performance

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ApiFlash really cheaper for basic screenshots?

For very low volumes (under 1,000 screenshots), ApiFlash's $7/month plan is cheaper. However, Capture's pay-per-use model often costs less for variable usage, and you get multiple APIs for the same price.

Can I get PDFs with ApiFlash?

No, ApiFlash only provides screenshots. You'd need a separate service for PDFs, content scraping, or metadata extraction. Capture includes all these APIs in one platform.

Which service is more reliable?

Both services are reliable, but Capture has been operating since 2017 with proven track record. ApiFlash uses AWS Lambda which is also reliable, but has fewer advanced features for error handling and monitoring.

Do I need to rewrite my entire application to switch?

Not necessarily. If you're using ApiFlash's basic parameters, migration to Capture's SDK is straightforward. The SDK handles authentication and URL construction, making your code cleaner and more maintainable.

Upgrade to a Full-Featured Platform

Get screenshots, PDFs, content extraction, metadata, and AI browser capabilities in one platform. Start with 100 free credits – no commitment required.